1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Austin-Healey |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Sprite |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 27 L |
