1964 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1998 Renault Espider

To start off, 1998 Renault Espider is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Renault Espider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Espider (191 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. (59 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite.

Because 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Espider (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. (84 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Espider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite. 1998 Renault Espider has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite has manual transmission. 1964 Austin-Healey Sprite will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Renault Espider will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: