1964 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 740 kg more than 2000 Dodge Ram.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2000 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 468 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 6200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3940 mm |