1964 Bristol 408 vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Bristol 408 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Bristol 408 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bristol 408. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bristol 408 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1964 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bristol 408 | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | 408 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5130 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |