1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (389 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | SL |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 389 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
