1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 1999 Renault Scenic is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1999 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | Scenic |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |