1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2001 BMW Z3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 689 kg more than 2001 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 51 L |