1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Kia Forte. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 847 kg more than 2010 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Forte |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 52 L |