1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 518 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | 62 | Tiguan |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1557 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4427 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1808 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1687 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2604 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |