1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Honda Civic
To start off, 2013 Honda Civic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2013 Honda Civic. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 797 kg more than 2013 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Honda Civic | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Civic |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1278 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4458 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1397 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |