1964 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 377 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | Munga | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |