1964 Ford Anglia vs. 2012 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2012 Ford Kuga is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Kuga (197 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Because 2012 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Anglia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 2012 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Anglia | Kuga |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 53 L |