1964 Ford Falcon vs. 1984 Holden Astra
To start off, 1984 Holden Astra is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1984 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Holden Astra weights approximately 155 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 1964 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Falcon | 1984 Holden Astra | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | Astra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 855 kg |