1964 Holden EK vs. 2009 Honda Fit
To start off, 2009 Honda Fit is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Fit (117 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2009 Honda Fit | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | EK | Fit |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 117 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 144 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |