1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Bellel | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Isuzu | Holden |
| Model | Bellel | Epica |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
