1964 Isuzu Minx vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 70 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Minx | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Minx | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |
