1964 Maserati Mistral vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,694 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1964 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Maserati Mistral | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | Mistral | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3694 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 243 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |