1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 666 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Bluebird | BLS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1188 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2680 mm |