1964 Renault 8 vs. 2012 Opel Combo

To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Renault 8 (95 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Renault 8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.

Because 1964 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault 8. (99 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault 8.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Renault 8 2012 Opel Combo
Make Renault Opel
Model 8 Combo
Year Released 1964 2012
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1108 cc 1364 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 95 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 99 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 73.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 80.6 mm
Top Speed 171 km/hour 164 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4330 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2280 mm 2720 mm