1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 475 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Seat 1500 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Seat | Cadillac |
| Model | 1500 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |
