1964 Willys-Overland Aero vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Willys-Overland Aero would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Willys-Overland Aero | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Acura |
| Model | Aero | CL |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2580 mm |
