1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2007 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 936 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2007 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | STS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |