1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110.
Because 1965 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alpine A 110 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2490 mm |