1965 Austin A 90 vs. 2008 Mazda 6

To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 90 (120 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.

Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin A 90 2008 Mazda 6
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 90 6
Year Released 1965 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 104 HP
Torque 221 Nm 145 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 83.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 55 L