1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1950 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 556 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1950 Maserati A6GCS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Maserati |
Model | 3000 Mk III | A6GCS |
Year Released | 1965 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 624 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2320 mm |