1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1953 Austin-Healey 100
To start off, 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 234 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1953 Austin-Healey 100 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Austin-Healey |
| Model | Sprite | 100 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2660 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 948 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 54 L |
