1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 466 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Austin-Healey |
Model | Sprite | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1965 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 54 L |