1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Chevrolet Caprice 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Chevrolet Chevrolet
Model Caprice Camaro
Year Released 1965 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6476 cc 2474 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 275 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 5420 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2580 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]