1965 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 273 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 3 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |