1965 Holden EH vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden EH weights approximately 15 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden EH | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | EH | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 238 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
