1965 Jaguar MK II vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1965 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1965 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 120 kg more than 1965 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar MK II | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | MK II | Outlander |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 59 L |