1965 Mazda R 360 vs. 2010 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Doblo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Doblo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Mazda R 360 | 2010 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | R 360 | Doblo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2755 mm |