1965 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1965 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1965 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Plymouth Valiant | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Plymouth | Cadillac |
Model | Valiant | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3302 mm |