1965 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1835 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (494 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Seat 600 | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Seat | Ford |
| Model | 600 | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 767 cc | 5400 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Torque | 47 Nm | 494 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5885 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1887 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3670 mm |
