1965 Steyr 650T vs. 1953 Steyr 2000
To start off, 1965 Steyr 650T is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Steyr 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Steyr 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Steyr 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Steyr 2000 (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Steyr 2000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Steyr 2000 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1965 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Steyr 650T | 1953 Steyr 2000 | |
| Make | Steyr | Steyr |
| Model | 650T | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2660 mm |
