1965 Steyr 650T vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Steyr 650T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1965 Steyr 650T has manual transmission. 1965 Steyr 650T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Steyr 650T | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Steyr | Ford |
| Model | 650T | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 3010 mm |
