1965 Steyr 650T vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Because 1965 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Steyr 650T | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Steyr | Holden |
| Model | 650T | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2685 mm |
