1965 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2013 Smart Fortwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Smart Fortwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Smart Fortwo should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Smart Fortwo weights approximately 340 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Smart |
| Model | Fronte | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 360 cc | 1000 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 33 L |
