1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, both 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 and 1966 Cadillac Sixty were released in the same year (1966). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 999 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 2600 | Sixty |
Year Released | 1966 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 82 L |