1966 Alvis TF vs. 2001 Mazda Atenza
To start off, 2001 Mazda Atenza is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2001 Mazda Atenza. (103 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda Atenza.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Atenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda Atenza. (240 Nm). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda Atenza.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2001 Mazda Atenza | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TF | Atenza |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |