1966 Audi Variant vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-250 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Variant | E-250 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2824 mm |