1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1958 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 460 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1958 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Impala |
Year Released | 1966 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3851 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3030 mm |