1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (108 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 980 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | DeVille | 200 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |