1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1279 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 87 L |