1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 505 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | 2CV | Equator |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |