1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | Ami | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 250 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 74 L |