1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1989 Skoda Favorit
To start off, 1989 Skoda Favorit is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Skoda Favorit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Skoda Favorit (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Skoda Favorit should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Skoda Favorit weights approximately 274 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Skoda Favorit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1989 Skoda Favorit | |
Make | DAF | Skoda |
Model | Daffodil | Favorit |
Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 47 L |