1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Expedition (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1742 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Expedition (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102. 2013 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1966 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1966 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 102 | Expedition |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2652 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2332 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 106 L |