1966 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
