1966 Ferrari 206 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ferrari 206. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ferrari 206 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Ferrari 206. (217 HP @ 9000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Ferrari 206. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1966 Ferrari 206. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ferrari 206 | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Ferrari | Chevrolet |
| Model | 206 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |
